Someday in the future, I'd like to get something small and sporty to offset the CTS-V. The Boxster and the Elise are the two cars that interest me the most.
As with my Cadillac, I want cars that are "fancy" without totally breaking the bank. I know I could get similar performance for less money out of a Miata, MR2, FR-S/BRZ (in a few years, anyway), etc... but I like the exclusivity of Porsche and Lotus, as well as the relative sport purity of the brands. I know both cars are slow. I'm ok with that.
I'm not looking to buy anything anytime soon, and it's possible I never will (priorities change, and I have school and other important things ahead of me...) At the moment, though, I'm entertaining myself with thoughts of one or the other.
So, just for the sake of conversation, I'd like to hear what you guys and gals think about the pros and cons of each.
I like the Porsche because it's more common. Common cars are easier to find parts for, and there are more mechanics around that know how to work on them. Also, there will be a larger online community to turn to for support. The Boxster is also the more suitable daily driver. It's less of a toy than the Lotus. The Porsche brand is known to pretty much everyone, and the average person doesn't know one Porsche from another... so I can feel like a baller driving my budget Porsche, even if I got it for $10,000 The old Boxster doesn't look all that much different from the newer ones in the eyes of the average person.
Also, in terms of price, the Porsche is the cheaper purchase. An older model can be had for under $10,000 even now.
I like the Lotus because it looks exotic. It's a fascinating little toy. Most people have NO idea what it is, and that makes it cool. It's such an alien looking vehicle, unlike anything else on the road. Compared to the Porsche, it really is a toy. It's smaller, lighter, and dartier. It's thoroughly impractical. One step away from a motorcycle. Although, it seems more "special" than the Porsche. You can see old ladies driving the Boxster, but you'll probably never see one driving an Elise. Owning an Elise puts you in a much more exclusive club, so to speak.
The 4 cylinder engine is both appealing and unappealing. The models I could likely afford would have Rover engines in them. Rover engines, of course, are not available in the US in anything other than a Lotus, making engine repairs just as pricey as in the Porsche. The later models have Toyota engines, but those models still carry a high price tag. (edit: after further research, I discovered that the Rover-powered Elise models were not sold in the US. We just got the Toyota-powered versions starting in 2005.)
Anyway, I just wanted to put my thoughts down and see what others thought. Which would you choose, if given the option?
As with my Cadillac, I want cars that are "fancy" without totally breaking the bank. I know I could get similar performance for less money out of a Miata, MR2, FR-S/BRZ (in a few years, anyway), etc... but I like the exclusivity of Porsche and Lotus, as well as the relative sport purity of the brands. I know both cars are slow. I'm ok with that.
I'm not looking to buy anything anytime soon, and it's possible I never will (priorities change, and I have school and other important things ahead of me...) At the moment, though, I'm entertaining myself with thoughts of one or the other.
So, just for the sake of conversation, I'd like to hear what you guys and gals think about the pros and cons of each.
I like the Porsche because it's more common. Common cars are easier to find parts for, and there are more mechanics around that know how to work on them. Also, there will be a larger online community to turn to for support. The Boxster is also the more suitable daily driver. It's less of a toy than the Lotus. The Porsche brand is known to pretty much everyone, and the average person doesn't know one Porsche from another... so I can feel like a baller driving my budget Porsche, even if I got it for $10,000 The old Boxster doesn't look all that much different from the newer ones in the eyes of the average person.
Also, in terms of price, the Porsche is the cheaper purchase. An older model can be had for under $10,000 even now.
I like the Lotus because it looks exotic. It's a fascinating little toy. Most people have NO idea what it is, and that makes it cool. It's such an alien looking vehicle, unlike anything else on the road. Compared to the Porsche, it really is a toy. It's smaller, lighter, and dartier. It's thoroughly impractical. One step away from a motorcycle. Although, it seems more "special" than the Porsche. You can see old ladies driving the Boxster, but you'll probably never see one driving an Elise. Owning an Elise puts you in a much more exclusive club, so to speak.
The 4 cylinder engine is both appealing and unappealing. The models I could likely afford would have Rover engines in them. Rover engines, of course, are not available in the US in anything other than a Lotus, making engine repairs just as pricey as in the Porsche. The later models have Toyota engines, but those models still carry a high price tag. (edit: after further research, I discovered that the Rover-powered Elise models were not sold in the US. We just got the Toyota-powered versions starting in 2005.)
Anyway, I just wanted to put my thoughts down and see what others thought. Which would you choose, if given the option?
Comment