One of my first photoshops+watermark

[C91BLX7]

what do you think?

I know I spelt photography wrong though

[mayberry]

thats a super harsh angle man.

[C91BLX7]

thats a super harsh angle man.

what do you suggest?

[mayberry]

its a tad over-exposed imo, but a slightly less of an angle, so you don't have to tilt your head sideways to see the car. just keep shooting man. You know whats appeasing to the eyes. Just try and do that. the rest will come.

[C91BLX7]

its a tad over-exposed imo, but a slightly less of an angle, so you don't have to tilt your head sideways to see the car. just keep shooting man. You know whats appeasing to the eyes. Just try and do that. the rest will come.

Thanks. I see what your saying

[nghtrydr23]

bad composition. i was about to move this to the image gallery but decided not to next time post up the specs of the image such as: what type of camera, aperature, shutter speed.

the angle is very harsh, exposure is ok. the subject;s exposure is fine but the trees and the front plates are overexposed.

[Shinobi]

everything as stated above. your watermark can not be seen clearly. also, there are way too many distractions within that picture.

[kouzie]

I like it, I like it.......

[d112crzy]

the angle is very harsh, exposure is ok. the subject;s exposure is fine but the trees and the front plates are overexposed.

And this is not so much due to a bad photographer(well kinda), but it's more to do with a bad setting for photography.

[Camurai]

The lighting is bad (need a softer light like just before sunset or just after sunrise over the whole car), you need to compose the image better and improve the contrast for your watermark. (Darker color for a lighter background, or lighter color for a darker background.)

[C91BLX7]

How is this?

[nghtrydr23]

under exposed and totally a snap shot.

edit: wait for jack and his distraction criticism, thats his thing haha