If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
when you buy a new tensioner it comes the the tool to hold it down
93 Accord LX Sedan (sold)
01 Civic LX Sedan (sold)-93 Accord EX Wagon (totaled)
93 Accord SE Sedan (sold)-92 Accord EX Sedan (sold)
93 Accord SE Coupe (sold)-97 Accord SiR Wagon (sold)
automatic tensioner is just as realible as a manual tensioner, you don't need to go out and waste money, most of these motors are 9-18 years old and they are fine, if you took it out you'll have to open the bolt on the bottom and use a flat head screw driver to tightn it back up add some clean engine oil in there before you tighten it back then use a vice grip and just lock it, attach it back and only release when your timing is set.
automatic tensioner is just as realible as a manual tensioner, you don't need to go out and waste money, most of these motors are 9-18 years old and they are fine, if you took it out you'll have to open the bolt on the bottom and use a flat head screw driver to tightn it back up add some clean engine oil in there before you tighten it back then use a vice grip and just lock it, attach it back and only release when your timing is set.
why chance it? i haven't heard of anyone having a manual tensioner go bad on them, but i have heard quite a few stories of the auto going bad. There isn't a reason in my eyes to not do it. Why waste money? a lot of people dont waste money on oil changes because the chances of them having any real problem is minimal as long as they make sure there enough there. but they're retards.
i used the manual tensioner off my F22a1 when i did my swap. if you still have the stock motor, just swap that over. you might need a couple of bolts and washers from honda, but that'll cost you less than $10. less than any tool to put the auto on would be.
yeah i'd definitely recommend the manual tensioner. Before I swapped my H22 in thats the very first thing I changed along w/ the timing belt/waterpump. Most of the parts I borrowed from my F22A6, so it cost me about 20 bucks or less from the dealer.
member's ride thread
93' EX Coupe H22A w/ P2T4 Sir 5spd 191whp 155 wtq
99' Lexus LS400 157k VVTi V8 gets up & goes...new DD
91 Accord SE 176k
97' Honda Odyssey 199k miles...$485 spare van for my parents
why chance it? i haven't heard of anyone having a manual tensioner go bad on them, but i have heard quite a few stories of the auto going bad. There isn't a reason in my eyes to not do it. Why waste money? a lot of people dont waste money on oil changes because the chances of them having any real problem is minimal as long as they make sure there enough there. but they're retards.
i used the manual tensioner off my F22a1 when i did my swap. if you still have the stock motor, just swap that over. you might need a couple of bolts and washers from honda, but that'll cost you less than $10. less than any tool to put the auto on would be.
It is one of those things that gets greatly exaggerated on the internet.
I am not against the manual tensioner per se (it is easier to work with), but haven't had any problems with the auto ones either, and nearly every Honda since 1998 has used auto-tensioners in one form or another. Manual tensioners have failure points just as well.
I would have to agree that the auto tensioners aren't necessarily bad just over hyped. I'd go with what ever was cheaper and easier to work with. If putting a new auto tensioner in is going to be easier and cheaper, I'd just do that, but if the manual tensioners are cheaper and easier to work with... it all comes down to what you want to use. It's your choice, but they are both good.
Comment