Announcement

Collapse

Please DO NOT Post In The General Section

From this point on until otherwise briefed, posting in the general section of Performance Tech is prohibited. The only thing to remain here will be the stickies. We would just delete this section, but that would cause unintended results.


The majority of the threads created can appropriately be placed in one of the Performance Tech sub-forums or Technical; and the posting of them here is detrimental to the activity of said forums. If you have any questions about where you need to place your thread PM me or one of the other mods.


For the most part you all have caught on without this post, but there have been a few habitual offenders that forced me to say this.


Everyone will get a couple of warnings from here on out, after that I just start deleting threads.

Again if you have any questions, PM me or one of the other mods.
See more
See less

Sequential Turbo

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Sequential Turbo

    Just starting a thread to see what you guys think about a Sequential Turbo setup.

    Advantages?

    Disadvantages?

    #2
    If you're talking about what I think you're talking about, it tends to be awesome

    The turbo acts smaller at the low end so you get boost at low throttle and minimal turbo lag, then when you rev higher the turbo opens more like a large turbo so you can get a ton of boost at the top end. Because you have boost on the low end, your car also never falls out of boost when you shift. So you could run a knife edged crank a balance shaft delete a lightweight flywheel and everything, and still stay in boost when you shift.

    The disadvantage of it is that it has more moving parts so it's more likely for something to go boom

    Comment


      #3
      Unless you need 300lb ft of torque at 1800 rpm & 6500 rpm, prob not worth the complexity

      Good idea in theory, but even manufacturers w/teams of engineers & multi billion dollar research/prototyping resources couldn't get it right in cars like the RX-7.

      Better to go w/what's tried and true, and just get a good sized single turbo


      Originally posted by lordoja
      im with you on that one bro! aint nothing beat free food and drinks any day of the week, even if its at a funeral

      Comment


        #4
        the twin turbo supra is a sequential turbo stock and i see all to many people making them single or just standard issue twin

        the manifold needs to house both turbos and has a restrictive flow between the two
        not for performance IMO mainly for a streetable car that needs low end torque to get out in traffic or get some reasonable gas mileage with some performance as well
        ''COUPE''




        ''WAGON''

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by Sarthos View Post
          If you're talking about what I think you're talking about, it tends to be awesome

          The turbo acts smaller at the low end so you get boost at low throttle and minimal turbo lag, then when you rev higher the turbo opens more like a large turbo so you can get a ton of boost at the top end. Because you have boost on the low end, your car also never falls out of boost when you shift. So you could run a knife edged crank a balance shaft delete a lightweight flywheel and everything, and still stay in boost when you shift.

          The disadvantage of it is that it has more moving parts so it's more likely for something to go boom
          Yeah it's kinda like that.


          You use a smaller turbo for low end since it spools faster(I believe) the bigger turbo is for top end.

          apparently there's valves that are in place to cut off the second turbo till a certain rpm.


          My idea was manifold with the smaller turbo and bigger turbo possible going downpipe or somewhere around there.

          STS have turbos at the end of the exhaust? How is that even benficial?

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by Reignstarz View Post
            Yeah it's kinda like that.


            You use a smaller turbo for low end since it spools faster(I believe) the bigger turbo is for top end.

            apparently there's valves that are in place to cut off the second turbo till a certain rpm.


            My idea was manifold with the smaller turbo and bigger turbo possible going downpipe or somewhere around there.

            STS have turbos at the end of the exhaust? How is that even benficial?
            thats very complex and hard to get right. One of my friends joked that u almost have to be an engineer major to do the math to get it right lol.

            The other sequential turbo is a one-turbo setup. the turbo has moving parts in it that physically change the size of the turbo at certain points to give u boost throughout the powerband
            2013 Ice Cream Cruise!
            VIDEO: 2012 Ice Cream Cruise
            VIDEO: 2012 Ice Cream Cruise part 2
            The single largest cruise in the Midwest!
            August 3 ~ Omaha, NE

            By 1320 Video


            Member's Ride Thread

            Comment


              #7
              I'm so glad that my major is dual in math and mechanical engineering

              I know of one car that does have a sequential turbo at the end of the exhaust. It's beneficial because it runs WAY cooler than if it's in the engine bay, but you have less pressure to spin the turbo and more distance the air needs to move before reaching the engine. It's a complex setup but he's got some ridiculous power out of it.

              Comment


                #8
                You'll have enough issues running any turbo on a honda, especially on a budget lol. Keep it simple.

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by theSOB View Post
                  thats very complex and hard to get right. One of my friends joked that u almost have to be an engineer major to do the math to get it right lol.

                  The other sequential turbo is a one-turbo setup. the turbo has moving parts in it that physically change the size of the turbo at certain points to give u boost throughout the powerband
                  I remember these when they first came out. The blades adjust pitch so that they're more closed when it is spinning slow to pick up speed faster then once at speed they are straighter to allow the most flow. Makes the turbo way more efficient but also way over-complicated.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Originally posted by F22HB View Post
                    I remember these when they first came out. The blades adjust pitch so that they're more closed when it is spinning slow to pick up speed faster then once at speed they are straighter to allow the most flow. Makes the turbo way more efficient but also way over-complicated.
                    exactly
                    2013 Ice Cream Cruise!
                    VIDEO: 2012 Ice Cream Cruise
                    VIDEO: 2012 Ice Cream Cruise part 2
                    The single largest cruise in the Midwest!
                    August 3 ~ Omaha, NE

                    By 1320 Video


                    Member's Ride Thread

                    Comment


                      #11
                      So can someone explain the difference between these turbos and anti-lag?
                      '94 JDM H22A: 178whp 146wtq

                      Originally posted by deevergote
                      If you say double dutch rudder, i'm banning you...

                      Comment


                        #12
                        Originally posted by Sarthos View Post
                        I'm so glad that my major is dual in math and mechanical engineering

                        I know of one car that does have a sequential turbo at the end of the exhaust. It's beneficial because it runs WAY cooler than if it's in the engine bay, but you have less pressure to spin the turbo and more distance the air needs to move before reaching the engine. It's a complex setup but he's got some ridiculous power out of it.
                        It's a variable nozzle turbo... basically I think it changes the cross area of the exhaust inlet, so that a small amount of exhaust gas still enters the turbo at a high speed and makes boost

                        In any case, too much for a damn CB. I rode in an untuned 14B F22A1 CB, and that shit had enough low end pull. KISS


                        Originally posted by lordoja
                        im with you on that one bro! aint nothing beat free food and drinks any day of the week, even if its at a funeral

                        Comment


                          #13
                          One disadvantage is that to do it right your intake and exhaust is much more complicated than with a single.
                          spin city

                          Comment


                            #14
                            http://www.dsmtuners.com/forums/cust...bo-set-up.html

                            That link was from the guys sales page... which is here

                            http://www.dsmtuners.com/classifieds...duction-14647/

                            That link was brought up in another FI thread here on CB7T.

                            If you wanted to do it on an accord, I think you should just buy this guys setup and "Drill out the holes"

                            Seriously why go through the design and everything when this guy has already done it for you!?

                            Besides, that thing is BAD ASS!!! Just be prepared to cut anything and everything out of your way to make it fit.
                            Been a long time. Still alive...

                            Comment


                              #15
                              i'd think SUPER(chager) turbo set up would work better. old school raily

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X