Announcement

Collapse

Please DO NOT Post In The General Section

From this point on until otherwise briefed, posting in the general section of Performance Tech is prohibited. The only thing to remain here will be the stickies. We would just delete this section, but that would cause unintended results.


The majority of the threads created can appropriately be placed in one of the Performance Tech sub-forums or Technical; and the posting of them here is detrimental to the activity of said forums. If you have any questions about where you need to place your thread PM me or one of the other mods.


For the most part you all have caught on without this post, but there have been a few habitual offenders that forced me to say this.


Everyone will get a couple of warnings from here on out, after that I just start deleting threads.

Again if you have any questions, PM me or one of the other mods.
See more
See less

flywheel questions

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #16
    Originally posted by zipcreature
    Horribly O/T but I am wondering about the comment made about freeing up torque?
    I've never take a physics class, so I can't argue with you about technical terms such as your spinning shaft. I have a honest question, not a challange to what you said though.
    The question is this: If you take a car with stock rims and run it on a dyno, then swap on some lighter rims we are going to dyno more power? Is this what your saying?
    I'm confused basically about how taking away weight makes my car make more power, because my car is faster when it is stripped out of interior, but not because of the engine making more power. The car simply weights less, so the engine has less to haul around. But I still have the same 140hp.

    ???

    - Zipcreature
    yes, rotating mass is a different story than other wieght on the car. If I remember my highschool physics correctly (god, I should that was only last year) then torque is a measurement of work. Now, if you subtract weight from the "spinning shaft" by putting lighter wheels on, then you are reducing the amount of work that the engine has to do to spin to a certain RPM.

    Honestly, Im just talking in circles right now . . . its 1:14 am and I hardly remember anything from physics last year. Im sure someone else can pick up the peices of my shitty explanation and actually explain how this stuff works . . . but at this point, I dont know/remember enough to do it. sorry dude.
    -Mark-
    CB7
    CD5


    And if i could swim I'd swim out to you in the ocean
    Swim out to where you were floating in the dark.

    Comment


      #17
      you car will accelerate quicker and it will deccelerate quicker. . like everyone says, less mass to rotate. the weight of a lighter flywheel won't carry thru the rpm band as a heavy one. some people are for them, some aren't. depends on the set up. until you get use to driving one, it will be different than stock for some from what i am told.
      91 Ex CB9
      JDM h22 auto swap, now w/H23 5spd conversion, short ram intake w/K&N filter, DC ceramic header, 2.25" custom catback exhaust, AMR Engineering coilovers, 205/50/16's Enkei RS5's, front slotted rotors, Xenon body kit.

      W.I.P.
      p72 ecu on Hondata

      To Come
      Weight Reductions
      R33 or R34 front end

      Comment


        #18
        ive never heard anyone say that a lightweight flywheel isnt worth the money, everyone whose had them say they love them
        Shift_BOOST

        BOOM!

        Comment


          #19
          [QUOTE=zipcreatureThe question is this: If you take a car with stock rims and run it on a dyno, then swap on some lighter rims we are going to dyno more power? Is this what your saying?
          [/QUOTE]

          Yup. The dyno measure how quickly the *package* accelerates the drum. By lightening the wheels, or flywheel, or crankshaft, or whatever of rotating mass, you're lightening the mass that is being both powered and measured.

          Easier to accelerate, higher torque numbers recorded.

          And higher horsepower extrapolated.
          2003 Maxima SE Titanium Edition
          Polished Titanium ext, heated black leather int, heated leather steering wheel, HIDs, 255bhp, 6 speed, 15% tint.
          1993 Suzuki GSX1100F 136bhp

          Comment


            #20
            [QUOTE=SteveB]
            Originally posted by zipcreatureThe question is this: If you take a car with stock rims and run it on a dyno, then swap on some lighter rims we are going to dyno more power? Is this what your saying?
            [/QUOTE

            Yup. The dyno measure how quickly the *package* accelerates the drum. By lightening the wheels, or flywheel, or crankshaft, or whatever of rotating mass, you're lightening the mass that is being both powered and measured.

            Easier to accelerate, higher torque numbers recorded.

            And higher horsepower extrapolated.
            This makes sense to me. I suppose it only applies to moving parts though! Thanks for the explination.

            - Zipcreature
            Awesome!


            CB7. F22A. 5spd. CB7. Exedy. Chromoly. AEM. DCSports. Apexi. Progress Group. AGX. Suspension Techniques. Viberant. Goodridge. Facebook

            Comment


              #21
              May I add a thought??

              Better Power to Weight Ratio = Better Acceleration/Deceleration.

              I've always known torque in the automotive sense to be known as the "twisting effort" required to turn a staitonary object into a reciprocating object.

              So Less Reciprocal Mass would have to create more power as explained earlier with the HP formula.

              Comment


                #22
                i bought the prolite flywheel,cant wait to put on
                ACCORDEX92
                CHICAGO,IL

                H22A ACCORD

                Comment

                Working...
                X