Announcement

Collapse

Please DO NOT Post In The General Section

From this point on until otherwise briefed, posting in the general section of Performance Tech is prohibited. The only thing to remain here will be the stickies. We would just delete this section, but that would cause unintended results.


The majority of the threads created can appropriately be placed in one of the Performance Tech sub-forums or Technical; and the posting of them here is detrimental to the activity of said forums. If you have any questions about where you need to place your thread PM me or one of the other mods.


For the most part you all have caught on without this post, but there have been a few habitual offenders that forced me to say this.


Everyone will get a couple of warnings from here on out, after that I just start deleting threads.

Again if you have any questions, PM me or one of the other mods.
See more
See less

short ram intake vs cold air intake

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #31
    I have to disagree with keele.........From my understanding the cold air intake is better top end and short ram is better low end so you decide.........taking off from dead stop or highway pulls
    Last edited by mickey_601; 06-14-2008, 09:08 PM.
    Dont drive faster than your gaurdian angel can fly

    Comment


      #32
      What's wrong with having the stock intake? I think it is just as efficient.
      The only two designs that would make sense to me are 1. short ram with a very well designed heat shield/box or 2. modified stock intake with a slightly bigger air inlet tube
      Last edited by rexload; 06-14-2008, 11:27 PM.

      Comment


        #33
        Originally posted by mickey_601 View Post
        I have to disagree with keele.........From my understanding the cold air intake is better top end and short ram is better low end so you decide.........taking off from dead stop or highway pulls

        no offense what so ever.. but go do some research before you make such blatent statements.

        your theory makes no since whatsoever. and if it did, why don't race cars use this idea of yours?


        CAI has more low end torque because it already has more air ready available when taking off. Once up to speed and at higher rpm's it is struggling to pull that air from 4 ft away back up to the intake, causing a lag in the system, thus causing loss of power.

        SR does the direct oposit of this.ITB's are even worse on bottom end, but with a better tune and higher advancement in timing in the lower rpm's, you'll feel no lag whatsoever.

        All this dealing with the intake, also has to co-exzist with the style( intake manifold) IM that you have.

        I don't care if it's ITB SR CAI your IM has got to be ready for the change to work together.
        then it leads to your exahust allowing it to breathe even better./////////////////////////////////////.. it really is an endless cycle.
        "Self Renewed"

        Comment


          #34
          Keele i understand what you have said but this is no where near a blatent or ignorant statement. ITBs provide better throttle response therefore better torque, I was in no way calling out your intelligence or experience of cars just stating that I disagree. Short ram have better response therefore are torquer than cold air. If yours was the case I think, higher end N/A(naturally aspirated) cars would not use ITBs just a great cold air induction. Even motorcycles would not use such things if they didn't work. But I guess we just have to agree to disagree on this particular subject.
          Dont drive faster than your gaurdian angel can fly

          Comment

          Working...
          X