ex v.s. lx

[theone]

its driver and also weight.

i have a stock 91 coupe auto, with a f22a6 in it (was motor swaped back in the day, originally motor must of blew).

i ran it and it ran a 16.2-16.3, cant remember the time but it was something like that.

and my couzin has a 90 ex sedan...with mods, he ran a damn 18.9 , i was like DAMN!
but he also has a big as 15inch sub in the trunk plus the other things in it.

but i raced my 91 LX with my 90 EX (same exact car as my couzins..lol) and leave it like 9+ cars easily, but i have more then average shit done to my car.

but i kno 2 of my other couzins have cb7's
ones a DX and the others a LX...sedans...auto, i think they have the same motors in them....f22a1 if im right
and the LX smoke the hell out of the DX, but see the owner of the LX, shes a speedster, she just use to driving fast, so that might have be all driver there, because both r stock...under the hood wise.


p.s.-yes must of the people in my family have accord...

[punkrockimport]

heres what i think. i think if the same driver drove a dx, an lx, and an ex, they would be in that order. dx=slowest lx=second ex=fastest. this is if they were the same driving, and the same mods, if any. and if the cars were in the same condition. and another thing is that i dont see how in an automatic you can really affect the driving that much in quarter mile racing. you brake stall up and launch and keep the pedal pinned to the floor. thats isn't something you can really affect much with driving skill. in a 5 spd. though there is a lot of room you can lose or gain