Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Civics, yes or no

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #16
    Yeah, it was the double wishbone setup that made Hondas handle so well, as far as I've always been told!

    I dunno... just about ANY honda made after 1996 seems like a different maker to me. I mean, just about all of them are nice in their own right, but the newer ones just don't seem to have the same quality as the older ones. My roommate has a 96 Accord LX, and for some reason his car feels cheaper than my old CB7.






    Comment


      #17
      I like all civics! I like my CB7 better but I still like civics. EF's and EG's are nice! I dunno, I just like Honda cars period!!! Hondas have everything I like; Great styling, decent power, "drive the wheels off" reliability, endless tuning possibilities, and a great price! They are all good to me!
      FSAE(F Series Accord Enthusiasts) "A dying breed..." #15

      Need parts? Check out my 1990 EX part out!
      http://www.cb7tuner.com/vbb/showthread.php?t=60011


      www.clemsonscc.com

      Comment


        #18
        Originally posted by pwrusr
        I personally like the 88-91 civic Si hatchbacks and CRX Si's. Those are some of the coolest looking civics EVER

        even though the CRX is technically a CIVIC CR-X, a LOT of crx owners like myself will take offense to that.........THE LAST THING you wanna call our hatch's is a civic HB.....no......dont do that..only time you could die by a crx running over you...

        i'm jp........yea even though its got the trademark bitch end of the honda motors, the d-series, i think it suited the car, the car dint weigh as much as normal civics, and just seemed more sportier with that motor, even though i want an EF8 SiR that would be godlike.....

        but no.....civic!= CRX, just for ya'll info and all......we hate being called that...
        Happiness is CR-X shaped

        Comment


          #19
          Originally posted by accordme93
          Oh man I hate CRX's. That is the only Honda I hate. I don't care how fast they are. They are just so butt ugly to me.
          o how can u say that, one of the only hondas in the 1980's to make it to the top 10 car and drivers best cars of the 80's, you're the first person who said that crx's dont look good, i've owned 2 crx's......and almost always i've heard that the crx's are a special, different, change of a standard honda design......... i can tell u this.. and a lot of ppl will agree with me on this one............ its one of those few cars which look good no matter how old they are, and if ppl were to see a crx for the first time no way they'd guess that its almost 15 years old and was discontinued almost 12 years ago...
          Happiness is CR-X shaped

          Comment


            #20
            CRX > Del Sol

            I know the Del Sol was the "next CRX" but the design is missing something I think. I wonder if Honda will ever release another 2 seater Civic-based car...






            Comment


              #21
              i said yes
              R.I.P 1993 ACCORD LX ::::7-23-05::::

              Comment


                #22
                Originally posted by Deevergote
                Yeah, it was the double wishbone setup that made Hondas handle so well, as far as I've always been told!

                I dunno... just about ANY honda made after 1996 seems like a different maker to me. I mean, just about all of them are nice in their own right, but the newer ones just don't seem to have the same quality as the older ones. My roommate has a 96 Accord LX, and for some reason his car feels cheaper than my old CB7.
                I personally think the CB7 is the best accord made.!
                ~~~~~~~

                Comment

                Working...
                X