Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
honda, toyota caught lying about horsepower
Collapse
X
-
I believe the early 90's Mustangs were overrated by 20 hp at one point.
All of the 1960's advertised power numbers were not even close to being right. That's when they used SAE gross power though, but some cars were underrated by as much as 70-80 hp, while some were overrated.
In Japan there's a gentleman's agreement limiting power to 276 hp, but they claim a few cars have broken it.
-
Horsepower ratings
Vehicle 2005 2006
Acura MDX 265 253
Acura RL 300 290
Acura RSX 160 155
Chevrolet Corvette LS7 500 505
Cadillac XLR 440 469
Ford Explorer* 210 210
Honda Civic 200 197
Lexus LS430 290 278
Pontiac G6 200 201
Toyota Corolla 130 126
Scion xB 108 103
There is a 200 HP Civic? Damn where do I sign up? And why does it say Asian's Lie about HP? There seams to be Cadillac and Chevy here also. Even though their numbers are 'under' rated the title is still misleading because it makes the reader assume that the article is solely about Imports.
MEH!
- Zipcreature
Comment
-
Originally posted by zipcreatureAnd why does it say Asian's Lie about HP? There seams to be Cadillac and Chevy here also. Even though their numbers are 'under' rated the title is still misleading because it makes the reader assume that the article is solely about Imports.
MEH!
- Zipcreature
"The news is better for General Motors Corp. and Ford Motor Co. Some models such as the Chevrolet Corvette and the Ford Fusion sedan are faring better under the new testing procedures, which could give them a much-needed edge in the marketplace"
I dont care, i would take an import over a domestic anyday...
Comment
-
they are just finding ways to bash us minorities...they might as well just say that we lie about horsepower because we squint.
on the stairs, she grabs my arm, says whats up,
where you been, is something wrong?
i try to just smile, and say everything’s fine.
Comment
-
Originally posted by AccordWarriorI believe the early 90's Mustangs were overrated by 20 hp at one point.
All of the 1960's advertised power numbers were not even close to being right. That's when they used SAE gross power though, but some cars were underrated by as much as 70-80 hp, while some were overrated.
In Japan there's a gentleman's agreement limiting power to 276 hp, but they claim a few cars have broken it.
You read my frickin mind! I foget which year it was, but like the 98 was the last year they did the Cobra Mustang, skipped a year, then restart in 2000. Apparently the underrating of the HP was so severe that Ford was ordered to recall every single Cobra.
Rumor has it that the new Mustang Cobra has an accurate HP rating*.
*This is keeping in mind that they are reporting their horsepower not to the wheels, not even to the flywheel, but rather GROSS HP. Gross HP hasn't been used in terms since the 50's or 60's.Fix your Computer!
Originally posted by MikeWD, I'm a fanciful motherfucker. My ish is clean, quick, plush, mature and sophisticated.
┌─┐
┴─┴
ಠ_ರೃ
Comment
-
You're probably thinking of the 99 Cobras. The 03/04's were apparently underrated "just incase" because of this. http://www.muscularmustangs.com/2005/svtcobraslow99.php
Comment
-
Don't get me wrong, this is the SAE.. and if it's true then it is.. but here's my opinion:
Apparently in the article Ford said that they would tweak things a little before they would test their current models, could there be a reason behind this? Honestly I bet that Honda nor Toyota are a bit worried about the new standards because go drive down the street.. what matters to you right now, horsepower or gas prices? Don't get me wrong.. a lot of domestic cars are beginning to get good gas mileage. Explorer? Nah don't hope for it. It was said in the article that both European and Japanese automakers would recieve more of a negative effect than Domestic. If the new standards require all accessories to be on, how could turning the A/C on improve the horsepower on cars? If I recall horsepower is calculated on the amount of torque and we all know what I'm saying by that. HOWEVER.. on the otherside of things the domestic automakers really have been conservative with their horsepower ratings.. say the SRT-4. Big question is.. did they know? What do you guys think?
Comment
-
Honda/Toyota haven't lied about anything. They change in measurement procedures, results directly in a change of output rating. Every manufacturere will lose the same relative amount of HP if they switch to then new testing procedures without "re-tweeking" anything. Honda and Toyota both willingly switched to the new procedure and retested their cars. They didn't reprogram anything.
If the domestics were to do the same thing today, they would suffer the same outcome on about 1/2 or more of their cars, just like Honda and Toyota.
Don't forget that there are actually quite a few Honda Engines that are underrated too. The S2000, and Accord I4 and V6 come to mind.
Comment
-
Originally posted by owequititDon't forget that there are actually quite a few Honda Engines that are underrated too. The S2000, and Accord I4 and V6 come to mind.
Comment
Comment