Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Water Powered Car

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Water Powered Car

    More on the following pages!!!

    I have searched this forum, but couldn't find anything on this.

    have a look at this google video:
    Describes the the inventor of the waterpowered car and how he eventually died from "food poisoning"

    The ultimate free energy.

    Water Powered Car
    Last edited by lokuputha; 10-28-2006, 03:11 PM.
    DEVOTE


    __________________________________________
    FS: Lokuputha's Stuff
    "It's more fun to drive a slow car fast than it is to drive a fast car slow."-The Smartest Man In The World

    #2
    he said the arabs offered him 1billion to stop research....wow.

    i know the water is converted into hydrogen but i dont see how any piston motor could be converted to use the hydrogen like his dune buggy.

    Comment


      #3
      By sending a small current with a frequency that matches the resonating frequency of water, he was able to split the water atom into hydrogen and oxygen instantaneously.

      This was done right before combustion. After the combustion water would reform.

      They were describing this process as the ultimate free energy, and even more becuase this process seemed to create more energy than that was originally put into the water electrolysis process. Amazing!

      Imagine all of New York City powered by 1L of water.

      Everyone in the world would have energy, and in a matter of one instance, all the multibillion dollar energy companies would fall. I wonder what kind of resistance this inventor dealt wih?
      DEVOTE


      __________________________________________
      FS: Lokuputha's Stuff
      "It's more fun to drive a slow car fast than it is to drive a fast car slow."-The Smartest Man In The World

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by lokuputha
        By sending a small current with a frequency that matches the resonating frequency of water, he was able to split the water atom into hydrogen and oxygen instantaneously.

        This was done right before combustion. After the combustion water would reform.

        They were describing this process as the ultimate free energy, and even more becuase this process seemed to create more energy than that was originally put into the water electrolysis process. Amazing!

        Imagine all of New York City powered by 1L of water.

        Everyone in the world would have energy, and in a matter of one instance, all the multibillion dollar energy companies would fall. I wonder what kind of resistance this inventor dealt wih?

        wonder.
        DEFJAM

        MY RIDE ON CB7 DEFJAM on 93

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by lokuputha
          I wonder what kind of resistance this inventor dealt wih?
          If the technology really did work, and really was efficient enough to replace fossil fuels. i wouldn't be surprised if he received death threats hourly.

          Owner of https://theclunkerjunker.com

          Comment


            #6
            CB at 15:08.

            Comment


              #7
              he he yeah I saw the cb, I dont see where it says he got killed or anything tho?


              My Members Ride Page

              Comment


                #8
                This is baloney. Water can be converted BACK into hydrogen and oxygen gas by electrolysis, but the activation energy is so high the net energy output isn't worth the costs, from what I remember.

                Thermodynamically and chemically the whole thing doesn't make sense. It's analogous to a ball rolling down a hill from a stop, and stopping at a point higher than it started at...just doesn't make sense.


                Originally posted by lordoja
                im with you on that one bro! aint nothing beat free food and drinks any day of the week, even if its at a funeral

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by gloryaccordy
                  This is baloney. Water can be converted BACK into hydrogen and oxygen gas by electrolysis, but the activation energy is so high the net energy output isn't worth the costs, from what I remember.

                  Thermodynamically and chemically the whole thing doesn't make sense. It's analogous to a ball rolling down a hill from a stop, and stopping at a point higher than it started at...just doesn't make sense.
                  This doesn't make sense according to what we are tought at school. However I was reading that the physics branch of String Theory (which deals with resonance and such) may help to explain it. From what i gathered, this over-effecient electrolisis process occurs at very high voltages and very high frequencies, around the resonance frequency of water. There is still much to learn about this phenomenon.
                  DEVOTE


                  __________________________________________
                  FS: Lokuputha's Stuff
                  "It's more fun to drive a slow car fast than it is to drive a fast car slow."-The Smartest Man In The World

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Our lack of understanding arises from our inability to relate that which happens in the larger physical world to what happens in the atomic and subatomic leves. Thus we have one understandings for planetary motion and another for atomic and subatomic motion:

                    The two main branches of physics are:

                    (1) classical mechanics and electromagnetism physics
                    (2) the highly theoretical quantum physics.

                    String Theory attempts to merge the gap between the two.

                    ...please correct me if i am wrong.
                    DEVOTE


                    __________________________________________
                    FS: Lokuputha's Stuff
                    "It's more fun to drive a slow car fast than it is to drive a fast car slow."-The Smartest Man In The World

                    Comment


                      #11
                      I was just reading about string theory this morning on the train. The author seemed to be a big downer on it though.

                      In any case, we see a practical application of the resonance of water everyday. In fact, I used this principle not too long ago to cook oatmeal. It's called the microwave. Within the realm of electromagnetism, microwaves aren't that high frequency at all. However, to provide a sufficient voltage to create the necessary energy to power something like a car, there has to be significant energy put into the system. I'm going to watch the video now but again, with the advances made on all fronts in all the branches of science that relate to this, I'd be shocked if this guy was the first guy to get energy from breaking up water molecules.

                      The bond between the two hydrogen and one oxygen molecule is probably among the strongest in the chemical realm. A lot of energy is released in that reaction. I'm almost certain that that is how the hydrogen powered engine works. So for this guy to get energy from the reverse process brings out the skeptic in me.


                      Originally posted by lordoja
                      im with you on that one bro! aint nothing beat free food and drinks any day of the week, even if its at a funeral

                      Comment


                        #12
                        Originally posted by gloryaccordy
                        So for this guy to get energy from the reverse process brings out the skeptic in me.
                        Same here...thus my great interest in this topic.
                        DEVOTE


                        __________________________________________
                        FS: Lokuputha's Stuff
                        "It's more fun to drive a slow car fast than it is to drive a fast car slow."-The Smartest Man In The World

                        Comment


                          #13
                          I dont think anyone on this site has the knowledge or experience to say this IS or IS NOT possible. Like stated above. until we have a complete General Unified theory of the universe, nothing is beyond the realm of possibility.

                          Owner of https://theclunkerjunker.com

                          Comment


                            #14
                            Originally posted by Accord R33
                            I dont think anyone on this site has the knowledge or experience to say this IS or IS NOT possible. Like stated above. until we have a complete General Unified theory of the universe, nothing is beyond the realm of possibility.
                            I totally agree...and yet, the mainstream is so eager to shrug off many alternate
                            lines of thinking. The age old Earth is flat, Earth is round scenario.
                            Last edited by lokuputha; 10-17-2006, 01:24 AM.
                            DEVOTE


                            __________________________________________
                            FS: Lokuputha's Stuff
                            "It's more fun to drive a slow car fast than it is to drive a fast car slow."-The Smartest Man In The World

                            Comment


                              #15
                              Originally posted by Accord R33
                              I dont think anyone on this site has the knowledge or experience to say this IS or IS NOT possible. Like stated above. until we have a complete General Unified theory of the universe, nothing is beyond the realm of possibility.
                              I just read a book by some dude who totally pooped on the possibility of a GUT. I'm trying to find out the latest developments on it but it seems like we've hit the end of the road. They got EM, the nuclear force and I forget the other one...but they still haven't worked in gravity.

                              Even if they do figure it out...within the realm of our daily existence, all the forces are separate as we don't live at a high enough energy level for the forces to all act at the same...levels? Plus particle accelerators need to be impractically large to find more unseen particles. Bleh.

                              It would have been awesome to grow up during the early 20th century, watching physics unfold. But eh.

                              In any case, I hate to sound like a hater, but this guy has his process patented, so I don't see why he can't provide more convincing or compelling science behind why his stuff works. 20,000Hz is nowhere near the resonant frequency of water, which in the electromagnetic spectrum is in the gigahertz range(microwaves), and from what I know is pretty hard to vibrate at mechanically with ordinary metal rods. The whole thing just seems like a hoax.

                              Not to mention, with all the pushing for hybrid technology, why hasn't any billion dollar car manufacturer discovered, and or used this guy's technology? I'm sure people were as skeptical when a patent officer rewrote how we see the universe, but still, at least Einstein made a much more convincing case. I need numbers and proof before I can cosign with this guy.


                              Originally posted by lordoja
                              im with you on that one bro! aint nothing beat free food and drinks any day of the week, even if its at a funeral

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X