Watching this intently to see how long it takes for it fail and get closed. You have some decent points and information, but it seems as though you aren't really explaining as you intended to, or at least claimed to intend to.
Also, I am not totally surprised by your position, but you still have a very clear, us vs them, anti-corporate mentality.
You also probably need to choose some more official sources, as those so far have been media documentaries, which are inherently biased and aren't necessarily forthcoming with sources and biases(even if it seems they are).
Second, your assertion about the "transfer" of wealth that occurred during the bailout is also false. First, they were issued with funds from the reserve AND the Federal government, but they were issued as loans, with interest rates, and we're NOT free handouts. Second, your theory seems plausible until you consider the alternative of allowing the financial system to fail, which would have resulted in a transfer of wealth nearly 10x larger because the collapse of the backbone of the economy would have preceded the collapse of our entire economy. When put into light with those facts, it doesn't seem unreasonable. Also, the Federal Reserve is not directly run by the government for very specific reasons. However, it is also not a completely privately controlled entity either.
Also, I am not totally surprised by your position, but you still have a very clear, us vs them, anti-corporate mentality.
You also probably need to choose some more official sources, as those so far have been media documentaries, which are inherently biased and aren't necessarily forthcoming with sources and biases(even if it seems they are).
Second, your assertion about the "transfer" of wealth that occurred during the bailout is also false. First, they were issued with funds from the reserve AND the Federal government, but they were issued as loans, with interest rates, and we're NOT free handouts. Second, your theory seems plausible until you consider the alternative of allowing the financial system to fail, which would have resulted in a transfer of wealth nearly 10x larger because the collapse of the backbone of the economy would have preceded the collapse of our entire economy. When put into light with those facts, it doesn't seem unreasonable. Also, the Federal Reserve is not directly run by the government for very specific reasons. However, it is also not a completely privately controlled entity either.
Comment