Originally posted by deevergote
View Post
I dont remember if it was Nancy grace, but it was some BS show like that-that said he was hit in the back of the head as he was entering his vehicle-follwing instruction. The today show confirmed the police report claims he was attacked while getting back into his vehicle, but does not state thats when he sustained the injury.
They both say that was when the fight ensued, at which point he shot the kid.
I dunno man, I think this is an evolving story that maybe never made the "press" in the first place because it was an open/close deal. Maybe the cops could've investigated more, and thats what fueled this from square one.
If the kid attacked zimmerman from behind after going back to his vehicle per 911, and thats where the wound on the back of his head came from-its hard to argue why he shot the kid.
The parents have also stopped calling it a race thing, and started calling it a "right vs wrong" thing.
Oh yeah, one more thing. They made it CLEAR on the today show this morning, that even though 911 operator told him to stop following, he didnt legally have to and the operator had no authority to tell him to do anything.
I mean CLEAR.
I was pretty surprised since ladyg was saying they are all sheriffs employees or something to that effect and implied that they did have some sort of authority.
Anyways, its terrible that as the real story is getting released by the police, or atleast the story they put in the report- now it looks more like zimmerman was justified. Look at the national attention this issue is getting, with race in mind, and this guy might have been 200% right for shooting this kid.
***Edit***
This is quoted from abc;
Originally posted by abc local news
Shitty deal, people rush to judgement and then you cannot take it back. Theres a lot of black people that genuinely believe this kid was targeted for being black.
What if he wasn't?
You cannot unring this bell, the damage has already been done.
Comment