wow

[MikeW]

Yeah, trucks do the same thing. Everyone in this town(or country??) is so fucking stupid. They think that blue and purple HIDs are cool and funny. Not only are they non-functional but they're rude and annoying.

[gloryaccordy]

Depends on the bulb. Remember, there's D2S and D2R. One has the painted tip and one does not. Acura, Nissan and Cadillac(to name a few) have all done non-projector HIDs successfully. You just have to be smart about it.

Heres the thing

All non retro bulb kits and reflectors are not created equal. Newish cars have pretty awesome headlight optics, and with a D2R bulb (painted bottom) can come close. Here's the beam pattern of a decent kit on an 8th gen Civic:



HID kits in CBs look like shit, cause CBs were the FIRST cars to have free form reflector headlights. So retros are really the only logical choice for us.

As for the OP, You break the law, don't cry about facing punishment. Ppl are so dumbs

[cbscandal]

"I....didn't know I couldn't do that..."

I'm sure I would have heard about it had I researched HID's. I've just never had to deal with them. I've never really been interested in them either, but I would retrofit.

[crazymikey]

I feel bad now for driving around in my Accord with HIDs in the stock lenses.

Here's the HIDs in my Mazda. The fogs arent that bright and dont glare, plus they're down so low anyways.





wow uber glare,anyone? I will admit that for the glare they produced in my Accord, the light output and visibility I had from them was fantastic. Those were DDM 6000k, which are the same I run in my Mazda.

[wed3k]

i hate hid's with a passion...its also because my VW is pretty low with no tint.