Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

this makes power.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #16
    Originally posted by fatboy1185 View Post
    Not likely, when single turbo setups would probably be making just as much or more power.
    To some people it's all about being different though. If I had the money to boost a F22 with one turbo, I might just save up for another turbo and do something even rarer (since a well setup boosted f22 isn't an everyday sight!)

    Edit: one big turbo means more lag than 2 small turbos! (gotta find something to argue about, )
    "This truck is 100% sh*ts and giggles."
    "Speed has never killed anyone. Suddenly becoming stationary... that's what gets you." Jeremy Clarkson

    You're not JDM until you have a car built in ohio with tons of bolt ons from ebay.
    Disregard females, acquire currency
    BUS 62 AIN'T F'ING AROUND!

    Comment


      #17
      Originally posted by fatboy1185 View Post
      Not likely, when single turbo setups would probably be making just as much or more power.
      W/10% of the headaches

      Can u imagine tracing a boost leak

      Anyways it's very possible it made that kind of power, but u could make that kind of power on a fully built H22 with one throttle.

      For 1, wheres the dyno sheet? 2 what other bolt ons did the motor have? Any internal work? Turbo? Supercharger? Nitrous? How's the fitment?

      I could see this actually making decent power as it def balances flow through the plenum and across the 4 cylinders. But it has super small plenum volume compared to stock, and just doesn't seem well thought out. I would really love more information but it seems like a dud.


      Originally posted by lordoja
      im with you on that one bro! aint nothing beat free food and drinks any day of the week, even if its at a funeral

      Comment


        #18
        He says that it made 261whp on his car. I'm guessing he had a few supporting mods. I highly doubt that intake would come close to making 220whp on a stock H22, never mind 261. Throttle response would be something to see though.

        They look like they are fabricated fairly well, be nice of him to include what type of throttles they are and there diameter. Might get more interest from people if there were more specs posted in his description.
        Last edited by GhostAccord; 09-14-2009, 04:55 PM.
        MR Thread
        GhostAccord 2.4L Blog

        by Chappy, on Flickr

        Comment


          #19
          Originally posted by turbomaxx View Post
          Edit: one big turbo means more lag than 2 small turbos! (gotta find something to argue about, )
          false. all else being equal, one turbo is MUCH more efficient than two that add up the same size.

          Click for my Member's Ride Thread
          Originally posted by Stephen Fry
          'It's now very common to hear people say, "I'm rather offended by that", as if that gives them certain rights. It's no more than a whine. It has no meaning, it has no purpose, it has no reason to be respected as a phrase. "I'm offended by that." Well, so fucking what?' —Stephen Fry
          Eye Level Media - Commercial & Automotive Photography: www.EyeLevelSTL.com

          Comment


            #20
            Originally posted by GhostAccord View Post
            Might get more interest from people if there were more specs posted in his description.
            so you could build your own :P

            Comment


              #21
              Originally posted by ikayto View Post
              poor man's itb?
              Thats what i was thinking.


              KeepinItClean | EnviousFilms | NoBigDeal | YET2BSCENE | .· ` ' / ·. | click here.
              Originally posted by Jarrett
              Is there a goal you're trying to accomplish besides looking dope as hell?

              Comment


                #22
                Originally posted by steelbluesleepR View Post
                false. all else being equal, one turbo is MUCH more efficient than two that add up the same size.
                I thought two small turbos would spool faster?

                Like a t3/t4 would spool up before, say, a T66? Right?

                I don't know much about turbos, since the only car I've ever even CONSIDERED boosting was my mustang, and it would have gotten a supercharger instead of turbo. This is DEFINITELY not my area of expertise,
                "This truck is 100% sh*ts and giggles."
                "Speed has never killed anyone. Suddenly becoming stationary... that's what gets you." Jeremy Clarkson

                You're not JDM until you have a car built in ohio with tons of bolt ons from ebay.
                Disregard females, acquire currency
                BUS 62 AIN'T F'ING AROUND!

                Comment


                  #23
                  Originally posted by fatboy1185 View Post
                  It's a h22 manifold....son.
                  shit i didnt read that lmao

                  Originally posted by turbomaxx View Post
                  Who cares if he WOULD run twin turbos... God forbid someone be a pioneer and do something different.

                  I'd love to pull up to a meet and pop my hood and say, "yeah, F22a6, fully built, twin turbos making XXX horsepower."

                  I think a lot of people would like to be able to say that was theirs,
                  haha
                  Originally posted by fatboy1185 View Post
                  oh, i guess he did.
                  i never said i had twin turbo?
                  Originally posted by steelbluesleepR View Post
                  false. all else being equal, one turbo is MUCH more efficient than two that add up the same size.
                  thats why i would have 2 bigass snails
                  to achieve a Fuck, you must first give a Fuck
                  Follow me on twitter @tru_whitetrash

                  Comment


                    #24
                    That design does make power. Plenty of people have tested it and made good power.

                    DH Racing was one of the first to try that design(dual tb). They made 300whp with it.

                    If you have access to cheap fabrication, it's a great option. But if you don't, then a EuroR with a bigger tb will do the job.

                    CrzyTuning now offering port services

                    Comment


                      #25
                      People make over 300whp with just a single TB, and this option certainly isn't a cheap alternative, so i don't seen the reason to have it.
                      Current 2016 Ford F150 XLT Sport
                      Past 1990 Accord EX Sedan
                      Past 1990 Accord LX Sedan
                      Past 1991 Accord LX Sedan
                      Past 1993 Accord LX Wagon
                      Current 1991 Accord EX Wagon

                      Comment


                        #26
                        Originally posted by fatboy1185 View Post
                        People make over 300whp with just a single TB, and this option certainly isn't a cheap alternative, so i don't seen the reason to have it.
                        The EuroR hasn't been completely public, so it either didn't exist or not enough people knew about it back then. So this design is what was opted for, still using the stock runners.

                        Also, it would probably cost $200 or so to have that made. Then I'd use 2 s2k tb's and modify the runners. You'd probably have the same amount of money into it as I would a EuroR, but the powerbands would be different.

                        But yea, with what we know today, ITB's or EuroR are the way to go for NA apps.

                        CrzyTuning now offering port services

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X