Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Smallpox vaccine 'triggered Aids virus'

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Smallpox vaccine 'triggered Aids virus'

    http://www.wanttoknow.info/870511vaccineaids

    Search the Title and see what you come up with.

    London Times
    Edition 1 MON 11 MAY 1987

    Smallpox vaccine 'triggered Aids virus'

    BY PEARCE WRIGHT, SCIENCE EDITOR
    The Aids epidemic may have been triggered by the mass vaccination campaign which eradicated smallpox. The World Health Organization, which masterminded the 13-year campaign, is studying new scientific evidence suggesting that immunization with the smallpox vaccine Vaccinia awakened the unsuspected, dormant human immuno defence virus infection (HIV).

    Some experts fear that in obliterating one disease, another disease was transformed from a minor endemic illness of the Third World into the current pandemic. While doctors now accept that Vaccinia can activate other viruses, they are divided about whether it was the main catalyst to the Aids epidemic.

    But an adviser to WHO who disclosed the problem, told The Times: 'I thought it was just a coincidence until we studied the latest findings about the reactions which can be caused by Vaccinia. Now I believe the smallpox vaccine theory is the explanation to the explosion of Aids.' 'In obliterating one disease, another was transformed.'

    Further evidence comes from the Walter Reed Army Medical Centre in Washington. While smallpox vaccine is no longer kept for public health purposes, new recruits to the American armed services are immunized as a precaution against possible biological warfare. Routine vaccination of a 19-year-old recruit was the trigger for stimulation of dormant HIV virus into Aids.

    This discovery of how people with subclinical HIV infection are at risk of rapid development of Aids as a vaccine-induced disease was made by a medical team working with Dr Robert Redfield at Walter Reed. The recruit who developed Aids after vaccination had been healthy throughout high school. He was given multiple immunizations, followed by his first smallpox vaccination.

    Two and a half weeks later he developed fever, headaches, neck stiffness and night sweats. Three weeks later he was admitted to Walter Reed suffering from meningitis and rapidly developed further symptoms of Aids and died after responding for a short time to treatment. There was no evidence that the recruit had been involved in any homosexual activity.

    In describing their discovery in a paper published in the New England Journal of Medicine a fortnight ago, the Walter Reed team gave a warning against a plan to use modified versions of the smallpox vaccine to combat other diseases in developing countries.

    Other doctors who accept the connection between the anti-smallpox campaign and the Aids epidemic now see answers to questions which had baffled them. How, for instance, the Aids organism, previously regarded by scientists as 'weak, slow and vulnerable,' began to behave like a type capable of creating a plague.

    Many experts are reluctant to support the theory publicly because they believe it would be interpreted unfairly as criticism of WHO. In addition, they are concerned about the impact on other public health campaigns with vaccines, such as against diptheria and the continued use of Vaccinia in potential Aids research.

    The coincidence between the anti-smallpox campaign and the rise of Aids was discussed privately last year by experts at WHO. The possibility was dismissed on grounds of unsatisfactory evidence. Advisors to the organization believed then that too much attention was being focussed on Aids by the media.

    It is now felt that doubts would have risen sooner if public health authorities in Africa had more willingly reported infection statistics to WHO. Instead, some African countries continued to ignore the existence of Aids even after US doctors alerted the world when the infection spread to the United States.

    However, as epidemiologists gleaned more information about Aids from reluctant Central African countries, clues began to emerge from the new findings when examined against the wealth of detail known about smallpox as recorded in the Final Report of the Global Commission for the Certification of Smallpox Eradication.

    The smallpox vaccine theory would account for the position of each of the seven Central African states which top the league table of most-affected countries; why Brazil became the most afflicted Latin American country; and how Haiti became the route for the spread of Aids to the US. It also provides an explanation of how the infection was spread more evenly between males and females in Africa than in the West and why there is less sign of infection among five to 11-year-olds in Central Africa.

    Although no detailed figures are available, WHO information indicated that the Aids league table of Central Africa matches the concentration of vaccinations. The greatest spread of HIV infection coincides with the most intense immunization programmes, with the number of people immunised being as follows: Zaire 36,878,000; Zambia 19,060,000; Tanzania 14,972,000; Uganda 11,616,000; Malawai 8,118,000; Ruanda 3,382,000 and Burundi 3,274,000.

    Brazil, the only South American country covered in the eradication campaign, has the highest incidence of Aids in that region. About 14,000 Haitians, on United Nations secondment to Central Africa, were covered in the campaign. They began to return home at a time when Haiti had become a popular playground for San Francisco homosexuals.

    Dr Robert Gello, who first identified the Aids virus in the US, told The Times: 'The link between the WHO programme and the epidemic in Africa is an interesting and important hypothesis. 'I cannot say that it actually happened, but I have been saying for some years that the use of live vaccines such as that used for smallpox can activate a dormant infection such as HIV. 'No blame can be attached to WHO, but if the hypothesis is correct it is a tragic situation and a warning that we cannot ignore.'

    Aids was first officially reported from San Francisco in 1981 and it was about two years later before Central African states were implicated. It is now known that these states had become a reservoir of Aids as long ago as the later 1970s.

    Although detailed figures of Aids cases in Africa are difficult to collect, the more than two million carriers, and 50,000 deaths, estimated by the World Health Organization are concentrated in the Countries where the smallpox immunization programme was most intensive. The 13-year eradication campaign ended in 1980, with the saving of two million lives a year and 15 million infections. The global saving from eradication has been put at dollars 1,000 million a year.

    Charity and health workers are convinced that millions of new Aids cases are about to hit southern Africa. After a meeting of 50 experts near Geneva this month it was revealed that up to 75 million, one third of the population, could have the disease within the next five years.

    Some organizations which have closely studied Africa, such as War on Want, believe that South Africa's black population, so far largely protected from the disease, could be most affected as migrant workers bring it into the country from the worst hit areas further north. The apartheid policy, they predict, will intensify its outbreak by confining the groups into comparatively small, highly populated towns where it will be almost impossible to contain its spread.

    FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of criminal justice, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.

    For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
    600HP" 1990 ACCORD LX COUPE COMING SOON


    CLICK HERE TO VIEW MY 1990 CB7

    #2
    My Car
    FREE Web hosting solutions

    Comment


      #3
      WoW.

      This is total bullshit just in case your wondering.

      There is no scientific or clinical facts to back this up.

      "No history of homosexual activity"? Ummmm you can get AIDS from a WIDE range of sources the least common is i think IS homosexual activity.

      Fucking garbage.

      Comment


        #4
        thats what happens when you fuck with science and mother-nature=playing with fire=death.

        Comment


          #5
          The biggest issue with that article is that it was from 1987 when we didn't know anything about anything regarding AIDS and HIV.

          Clearly, they were still in the "homosexual" mindset, even though at that time, it was spreading wildly through the heterosexual population, but many people were still dormant.

          I am not completely against the theory that this could have been a contributing factor, but overall, it is from a time period when it was a pandemic uproar over something we, frankly, didn't understand. We still don't, but we know more than we did.

          Since then, we have discovered that:

          1) There are multiple strains of HIV, which was one of the main hurdles in treatment, because something that might work on HIV-A and C was completely ineffective against HIV-B, etc. so some people would respond to some treatments, some people would respond to all, and some people would respond to none. They also found many people carrying multiple strains.

          2) We have also since learned that homosexuals are more prone to the diseases due to the fact that rectal and anal tissues tear much more easily than vaginal tissues and thus more easily allow foreign bodies to enter the bloodstream, but we have also found that hetero women are more likely to contract than hetero men because they receive the fluids, and thus are also more likely to have it enter the blood stream.

          http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HIV

          http://www.hiv.com/
          The OFFICIAL how to add me to your ignore list thread!

          Comment


            #6
            This sounds like more propaganda.

            There's more likely rumors cropping up about the chicken pox vaccine being responsible for the shingles virus. I can believe that, as they are the same family, and genetic mutations can and do occur as a result of viruses being exposed to these vaccines.

            Next thing you know, they'll say the swine flu is from... oh wait, they already have.

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by h22sparkle View Post
              thats what happens when you fuck with science and mother-nature=playing with fire=death.
              Take some time to think for yourself

              Originally posted by Ralphie View Post
              WoW.

              This is total bullshit just in case your wondering.

              There is no scientific or clinical facts to back this up.

              "No history of homosexual activity"? Ummmm you can get AIDS from a WIDE range of sources the least common is i think IS homosexual activity.

              Fucking garbage.
              Gotta watch out for the heroin addict prostitute homosexuals :P
              My Car
              FREE Web hosting solutions

              Comment


                #8
                Another hiv strain type was recently found in africa in the last 6 months. BTW people live longer now than they did before, they have cured aids and retrograded it into untraceable hiv. You need bone marrow from a person whose perants are european and have immunity to hiv. What good is that if soon this shit can be forced to mutate with common cold virus?
                Just dont go into dangerous places you dont feel comfortable in like a hookers yellow fluid spilling vagina unprotected and your straight. Strap up for war.

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by 8ball View Post
                  Another hiv strain type was recently found in africa in the last 6 months. BTW people live longer now than they did before, they have cured aids and retrograded it into untraceable hiv. You need bone marrow from a person whose perants are european and have immunity to hiv. What good is that if soon this shit can be forced to mutate with common cold virus?
                  Just dont go into dangerous places you dont feel comfortable in like a hookers yellow fluid spilling vagina unprotected and your straight. Strap up for war.
                  It is not cureable. It is possible to slow it down significantly though.
                  The OFFICIAL how to add me to your ignore list thread!

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X