What kind of Supercharger is this?

[Losiracer2]

I found a SC Thunderbird coupe today at the yard and it must've been the first day it got there. And I looked in the engine bay and found this: A ____ Supercharger. I just don't know what kind or type it is....I just got it to sell. So if anyone knows what it is, please tell me. Also what do they go for anyways? I snagged the throttle body along w/ it, I could go back for the intercooler if I need to later. It looks pretty clean inside and spins freely, so its not bad I don't think.

[jhoff]

eaton..almost the same as gtp
(trust me im part of few grand prix clubs, and we have a superbird vs grandprix clash twice a year)

[visualpoet]

Looks like the factory Eaton SC to me

*edit* beat me to it!

[new_beginnings]

Yes, Eaton. Looks like a Thunderbird part...

$300+

[CbSmEeZaY]

eaton m90

1000% positive

[Wutlis]

Looks like the factory Eaton SC to me

*edit* beat me to it!

The 89-93 Thunderbird SC and the 89-90 Mercury Cougar XR7 had this eaton supercharger. It produced about 12 PSI of boost to the 3.8 V6. I always wanted a SC with a 5-speed back in the day. I settled for the 92 t-bird with the Mustang 5.0 before I traded it in for a 95 Mustang Cobra back in 97.

[jhoff]

there not that efficient
the t brids dont have the mods for it like the gtp/ssei/ss/park ave/gs/rivera/lss
thats why you dont see so many of them driving

[owequitit]

It is an Eaton, but specifically it is a Roots type blower.

[jhoff]

eaton m90

1000% positive

hes right

[Wutlis]

there not that efficient
the t brids dont have the mods for it like the gtp/ssei/ss/park ave/gs/rivera/lss
thats why you dont see so many of them driving

x2 on inefficiency. It was a heavy car and not enough power to make it a true sports car. They couldnt make up their mind if it was going to be a luxury cruiser coupe or modifiable sports car.

[CbSmEeZaY]

hes right

yea my pops has an sc they are pretty fun to drive very easy to sling sideways...but to big for me.been workin on it with him since the day he got it...damn fords

[Losiracer2]

yeah well cool thanks guys! Yeah I did some more research on this car and it only had 210 hp lol. My NA H22A makes 200hp. It came off a 93 Thunderbird if I didn't state that already...but yeah the car looked pretty cool. It was a Dark Blue, and had some cool sideskirts, looked OEM along w/ some plush leather seats w/ some beefy side bolsters.

I was bummed that I didn't find any accord parts at the JY today so I decided to walk in the domestic section, lol, good thing that I did.

[CbSmEeZaY]

yeah well cool thanks guys! Yeah I did some more research on this car and it only had 210 hp lol. My NA H22A makes 200hp. It came off a 93 Thunderbird if I didn't state that already...but yeah the car looked pretty cool. It was a Dark Blue, and had some cool sideskirts, looked OEM along w/ some plush leather seats w/ some beefy side bolsters.

I was bummed that I didn't find any accord parts at the JY today so I decided to walk in the domestic section, lol, good thing that I did.

yea but does your h22 have 320 ft lbs of trq

[C91BLX7]

That would be a charger for a 3.8 V6 ford, one of the worst engines ever.

[owequitit]

yea but does your h22 have 320 ft lbs of trq

Does the Accord weigh in at nearly 3700lbs?

Oddly, his H22 CB7 doesn't need 315 ft/lbs to turn in equal performance.

Perhaps there is a misunderstanding about how torque relates to performance in this thread.

Besides, how did a thread about what kind of SC it was turn into a thread about who had more torque?